The use of drones….

Dear friends and readers.

 Thanks to the A.C.L.U. ( American Civil Liberties Union ) and other extreme left leaning individuals, our current president and government are still catching flack over the killing of U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen.

  My question to anyone in the A.C.L.U.  “  How many Americans have to die before it’s considered ‘ok’ to kill an American citizen”?

  An F.B.I. investigation into Nidal Malik Hasan ( the Ft. Hood shooter)*

Revealed at least 18 emails between Anwar and Nidal….EIGHTEEN!  That alone should have raised red flags, banners and prompted action long before the Major shouted “ Allahu Akbar “ and opened fire on troops that had previously returned from a deployment, wounding 43 and killing 13. 

*  In Wiki and other articles he is called the "alleged shooter" I offer him no doubt to the commiting of his crime.

  Shortly after the shooting, Anwar al-Awlaki posted the following on his blog:

Nidal Hassan is a hero.... The U.S. is leading the war against terrorism, which in reality is a war against Islam..... Nidal opened fire on soldiers who were on their way to be deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. How can there be any dispute about the virtue of what he has done? In fact the only way a Muslim could Islamically justify serving as a soldier in the U.S. army is if his intention is to follow the footsteps of men like Nidal.
The fact that fighting against the U.S. army is an Islamic duty today cannot be disputed. No scholar with a grain of Islamic knowledge can defy the clear cut proofs that Muslims today have the right—rather the duty—to fight against American tyranny. Nidal has killed soldiers who were about to be deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan in order to kill Muslims. The American Muslims who condemned his actions have committed treason against the Muslim Ummah and have fallen into hypocrisy.... May Allah grant our brother Nidal patience, perseverance, and steadfastness, and we ask Allah to accept from him his great heroic act. Ameen.^[144][145]

  At what point does Anwar deserve protection under the Articles of the U.S. Constitution?  My point here is he doesn’t.  In other investigations, Anwar’s name came up in a dozen terrorism plots in the U.S., Canada and the U.K.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki#Fort_Hood_shooter

  If everyone could do one thing to help our government out, it would be to not judge them harshly in this case….another thing would be to go to the A.C.L.U. website and give them a piece of your mind….Civil Liberties are one thing, protecting a terrorist is another.  The A.C.L.U. has grown too big for their own britches, and in trying to protect one, they offend everyone else.  Thank you friends and readers.

  I, for one, support the use of drones, in taking out terrorists, no matter who they are….if they plot against the U.S. or our Allies, they are targets.

Have a great day and find a smile in your journey!

Trevor M Dodge