Translate

Monday, June 4, 2012

Typical response....

  Hello everyone,

  Some time ago, before I had re-deployed, I emailed a query to President Barack Obama in regards to the need or necessity of the archaic Electoral College.   If you go back to some earlier posts, the Electoral College is the practice of choosing 538 folks from all 50 States and Washington DC who cast their votes for a candidate who will later become President.  Voting at the polls ( our "popular vote" ) has no bearings on the outcome of the Election.  This is a typical response from "The White House" that  was written by Tanya Robinson.




 
Why the Electoral College is Important
By Tonya Robinson, Special Assistant to the President for Justice and Regulatory Policy
Thank you for taking the time to participate in the "We the People" petition process. We launched this online tool as a way of hearing directly from you, and are pleased to see that it has been effective in soliciting your feedback. We understand your interest in the petition to support granting citizens the ability to vote for the President directly by dissolving the Electoral College, and appreciate the opportunity to share the Administration's views on this issue.
While supporters of the popular vote argue that the Electoral College gives a disproportionate amount of influence to smaller states, reforming this system also raises difficult questions. For example, others have argued that a national popular vote would create a similar problem, granting the largest cities and states a disproportionate amount of influence and drowning out the voices of voters in less populous states.
In any event, the President cannot address this issue alone. As you may be aware, Article II of the United States Constitution, as amended, sets out the number of "electors" that each state is entitled to have, which is equal to the total number of that state’s Senators and Representatives in Congress. Article II further allows each state’s legislature to determine the means of choosing its electors.
While the future of the Electoral Colleges is certainly a legitimate topic for public debate, the President does not have the power to change this Article of the Constitution. A constitutional amendment, which requires a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress (or a Convention under Article V of the Constitution) and ratification in three-fourths of all fifty states, would be required.
Stay Connected




  While this is a well worded response, does the Government truly believe that the States are truly RED and BLUE?  To believe that my home state is strictly 100% Democrat is fallacy even though in smaller elections, most of Washington's elected officials are Democrat.

  Does anyone reading this have any thoughts?  Pro or con, for the Electoral College or against.  Feel free to post comments.  Thanks all and have a great week.

Trevor